Table 1

Differentially expressed proteins identified by proteomics from retinas of ED7, ED11 and ED15 of embryo chick retina.







Theoretical value
Experimental value
Changes(ratio)

Protein
Est'Z
Taxonomy
Sequence coverage(%)
ncbi ID
pH
Mr (kDa)
pH
Mr (kDa)
ED7:ED7:ED15

S1
Fatty acid-binding protein, retina
2.13
Chick
61
Q05423
5.6
15.02
5.5
15
(-):(+):(+)
S2
Wnt-9
0.98
P. hagfish
37
P28124
11.3
15.06
5.75
10
1:14:4.6
S3
Ubiquitin like protein, SMT3A
0.4
Human
24
P55854
5.3
11.68
7
10
1:9.6:1.2
S4
unnamed protein product
0.66
Mouse
12
BAC32207.1
5.3
80.05
6.75
70
1:2.4:2.3
S5
Alpha enolase
2.38
Chick
35
P51913
6.2
47.63
6.5
100
1:2.2:1.7
S6
Sin3B
0.76
Human
10
AAH05113
6.6
49.62
9
45
2.1:1:0.3
S7
hypothetical protein
1.03
Human
23
CAD38885.1
9.2
26.71
9
35
2.5:1:1.7
S8
unnnamed protein product
0.99
Human
44
BAB14762.1
5.5
29.35
4
20
2.4:1:1.7
S9
unnamed protein product
1.51
Human
43
BAB85061.1
5.4
17.7
4
20
4.2:1:1.6
S10
ZZ type zinc finger containing protein
0.52
C. elegans
15
NP498699.1
4.5
64.85
4.5
30
7.5:1:4.2
S11
GABA receptor-A beta-3
0.61
Chick
12
P19019
9.4
54.76
5
45
2.8:1:4.1
S12
Flice
0.72
Mouse
18
CAA04196.1
5.3
49.35
5
70
1:2.9:(-)
S13
Keratin-9
2.43
Human
36
NP000217.1
5.1
62.2
9
45
1:2.3:4.0

S1 – S13 means ID numbers of spots. Taxonomy category was used for search. Probability, Est'Z, sequence coverage, and theoretical value of pI and Mr were obtained from the Pro Found search. The calculation of experimental pI and Mr was based on the migration of the protein in a 2D gel. Changes indicate the ED7 chick retinal protein volume ratio compared with that of ED11 and ED15. (-) indicate that protein spots were not detected

Mizukami et al. Proteome Science 2008 6:3   doi:10.1186/1477-5956-6-3